![]() ![]() The social indistinctiveness of the categorical tolerants was quite visible, and it indeed increased over time. The absence of ambivalence among the univores suggests very rigid symbolic boundary-drawing by them. In addition to their wide-ranging taste and advantageous social position, we found the omnivores’ social attitudes to be very liberal, postmaterialist and more tolerant than the average. Their views deviate from each other, although the polarization in this sense has diminished in a decade. The results show that the omnivores and the univores are on many accounts situated on the opposite ends of the liberal-conservative axis. The empirical analyses scrutinise three taste orientations – omnivorousness, univorousness and ‘categorical tolerance’ (Lizardo & Skiles 2016) – to answer the following questions using two nationally representative surveys on cultural taste in Finland: (1) How did the cultural taste orientations change between 20 when considering musical like, dislike and ambivalence? (2) How do socio-political attitudes associate with cultural taste orientations and socio-economic factors, and can we observe change in these dynamics between 20? A longitudinal research design is used to explore whether there are changes in taste that tap to symbolic exclusion, inclusion or ambivalence. The paper aims to determine how cultural taste and social tolerance coincide and which symbolic boundaries they relate to. The results indicate that participating in a specific scheme is generally more strongly related to social integration than breadth of taste, although relations with participation in a specific scheme may depend on whether or not one participates in other schemes as well. We focus on the question whether these attitudes are related to breadth of taste, to characteristics of the specific schemes constituting a taste pattern, or to both. Secondly, the relations between different types of omnivorousness and attitudes concerning social integration are estimated. Seeing omnivorousness as an engagement in elements from at least two of these schemes, we can logically identify a number of combinatorial taste patterns and thereby distinguish between different types of cultural omnivores. To this end, we use a well-known division of the cultural field into three distinct cultural schemes: highbrow, pop, and folk. Firstly, different types of omnivores will be discerned. This article attempts to move the discussion about the cultural omnivore ahead in two ways. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |